MERHBA FIL

WE SWEAR TO FREE MALTA FROM THE SLAVERY, COLONIALISM AND DICTATORIAL ILLEGAL EUROPEAN UNION RULE

TELL YOUR PARLIAMENTARY DEPUTY THAT YOU WANT MALTA TO REGAIN INDEPENDENCE AND FREEDOM

The European Union ordered that in 2011 the Maltese and Gozitan people pay it €68,000,000

€186,000 daily stolen from your childrens mouths

Our country loses in the war against Libya

By Karmenu Mifsud Bonnici Campaign for National Independence CNI

The Maltese Government is approving the aggression that NATO is implementing against the Libyan people on the pretext of resolution number 1973 of the United Nations Security Council that authorized that military action be taken to protect the civil population.

This resolution is legally invalid because it was taken on the provision of Chapter seven of the United Nations Charter that contemplates military action in case of a threat to the security and peace in the region.

Therefore the Security Council made a mistake when it authorized military attacks on Libya, and the attacks that NATO is implementing are an unjustified aggression against a country that did not provoke any other country.

The European Union supported the taking of the invalid resolution and the NATO military attacks.

Therefore the European Union was also mistaken in its hostile attitude that it adopted against Libya that were previously taken by the Security Council.

The Maltese Government, like a faithful dog of the European Union, showed the same hostility towards the Libyan Government, and took part in the EU Council of Ministers in the decisions to extend and increase the sanctions against Libya that were previously taken by the Security Council.

The Maltese Government should have known that it was France and England that forced the United States of America to insist with the United Nations to pass resolution number 1970 and 1973 that imposed sanctions against Libya and authorized that all necessary measures be taken to protect the civil population, including implementing a no fly zone.

The insistence of France and England to attack Libya was not motivated by the protection of the Libyan civil population, but simply raised by the strategic interests of the two countries both in the commercial sector as well as in the political sector.

That is why the President of the European Council, Van Rompuy, the President of the European Commission Barroso and the Representative of the EU Foreign Affairs, Lady Ashton, supported the military action against Libya, the biggest EU member country, Germany did not agree, and insisted that military action is unjustified interference in the internal affairs of a country, and a number of other EU member countries also did not agree with the taking of military action.

Malta, which according to the Maltese Constitution has to actively work for peace and is against war, did not have the wisdom to do like Germany and not agree that military attacks be conducted against the Libyan people. Malta went against the peace vocation and did what it was ordered to by the European Union that had blessed the war, although it said that it was not going to allow its military facilities to be used by foreigners.

The Maltese Government said more than once that it supports the decisions taken by the United Nations Security Council against the Libyan people, although those decisions are legally invalid and are being abused.

Because while the Security Council decided that there shall be a no fly zone over Libya so that the Libyan Government aircraft would not be able to attack the rebel forces, NATO is regularly attacking from the air to destroy the government forces, as well as to assist the offensive that the rebel forces are conducting against the government forces. In this manner, the no fly zone means that the government forces do not have help from the air, while the rebel forces have the help of the NATO air force.

The Maltese Government knows that the attacks that NATO is carrying out in Libya are not only to protect the civil population, as wanted by the Security Council.

NATO is also attacking residential areas in Libyan cities, and is causing deaths and casualties among the civil population, apart from causing great damage to the country’s infrastructure.

Member countries of the Security Council such as Russia, China and India more than once accused NATO that it is going beyond what was authorized by the Security Council, but the Maltese Government never felt the need to state that it does not agree to the barefaced aggression that is being conducted against the Libyan people.

Although the Security Council decided that weapons should not be sent to Libya, the Maltese Government knows, as every government knows, that weapons are being sent to the rebels, and France, England, Italy and the United States of America are sending military personnel to train and arm the rebels in their fight against Gaddafi.

The European Union prepared a group of about one hundred soldiers to help in humanitarian aid, and they are ready to be sent to Libya at a moment’s notice as requested.

Although the Maltese Government has not said anything publicly about this group of soldiers on a humanitarian mission, it is not going to stand back from giving its share if these European Union soldiers are sent to Libya, always on the pretext of humanitarian services.

Among the sanctions imposed by the Security Council and those decided by the European Union there is the blockade by both the sea and air of people, as well as merchandise to Libya and from Libya.

This blockade does not help the civil population, indeed causes great damage, and is not justified, if not causing a great inconvenience to the Libyan people, and not to the Libyan Government.

The Maltese Government was one of the first to put into effect these sanctions without examining whether they are justified and why should the Libyan people be subjected to these lack of provisions as well as the facilities to travel out of the country.

When in previous years Libya was hit by other sanctions, between Malta and Libya there was regular sea transport for people, as well as for merchandise.

The Maltese Government did not even ask for an explanation why this time the means of transport between Malta and Libya was stopped completely, causing damage not only to the Libyans, but also to us Maltese.

Although the Security Council did not state the measures that were to be taken England and the United States of America declared that they are not going to stop the bombardments on Libya if the Gaddafi Government is not deposed.

The Maltese government is showing that it is agreeing with this line that totally belies the declared scope of the NATO military intervention to protect the civil population.

The real scope is to depose the Libyan Government, even for this to happen, the civil population is going to suffer hundreds of deaths and casualties.

Neither when more than once NATO bombarded Gaddafi’s residential Quarters, with the precise aim of killing him, did the Maltese Government show any signs that it does not agree with this NATO’s condemnable action.

But perhaps the greatest contradiction in the European Union and Maltese policy on Libya is found in the declarations in favour of the humanitarian mission that both the Union as well as Malta say are developing, and that what they are doing is encouraging the rebels to continue fighting against the Libyan Government and not to stop fighting before it is deposed and thus continue to increase the sufferings that the Libyans are sufferings.

A cease fire will stop the deaths, the wounded and make it possible to give all necessary help to the civil population.

This would be greater and the best humanitarian service that can be given to the Libyan people and that is why the European and Malta should do their utmost to influence the rebels to arrive at a cease fire.

The Maltese Government appears not to want a cease fire if the Libyan Government is not deposed.

Because it should be the Libyan people who decide whether the Libyan Government is deposed or not and the Libyan people are not made up only of the rebels, but also hundreds of thousands of other Libyans who support the Government.

That is why the Maltese Government has no right and no reason to say that the Libyan Government should resign for fighting to stop and for there to be an agreement in the country, and the Maltese Government should say that it believes that the Libyan people should be allowed to decide what should be done by the government of the country, by means of a free and just election, without interference by the foreign countries.

The speeches that the Maltese Government keeps repeating that it cannot tolerate the Libyan Government to use weapons and violence against the people who protest peacefully do not make sense.

This does not make sense in the case of the war in Libya, because the Government there is fighting not against people who are protesting peacefully, but fully armed rebels who are fighting with weapons, tanks, with cannons and attacking cities that are under the control of the government forces.

It was therefore absurd that the Maltese Government tries to justify itself to approve the military attack against the Libyan people by saying that this was necessary to prevent a genocide in the country.

But no one can count how many people are being killed with the bombs and missiles that are being dropped night and day on the Libyan cities and towns, without Malta speaking and condemning these acts of unjustified aggression.

In this Libyan war, Malta showed that with its European Union membership, it lost its identity to act independently as it feels right and just, and Malta is just doing what the big European Union countries dictates should be done, even though these do what is in their own best interests and not that which is just.

Malta, if it is still a free and independent country in its policy of neutrality and in favour of peace, should never have agreed to unite with countries such as England, Italy, France and the United States of America to attack another country with a population of only six million, but has natural energy resources that are very useful for those countries.

On principle, our country should always oppose every attack that a country makes on another country, more so when the victim country is a small country and the countries attacking it are strong military countries and pretend that they have a diviner right to dominate and order other people.

In the aggression against the Libyan people Malta is supporting the aggressors, instead of being neutral if it does not want to help the people being attacked. European Union membership has made us lose our soul as a country that does not accept that wars solve problems, but increase them more.

Our country is going to end up the loser fro this Libyan war, whatever its final result.

The Maltese people want Parliament to take steps forthwith to curb immigration in our country

Please sign the popular petition to the Maltese Parliament to take the necessary measure to curb illegal immigration in our country

WE WANT INDEPENDENCE FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION

If yes, help CNI in its work so that the majority of the people would want to get rid of European Union rule.