WELCOME TO THE CNI WEBPAGE

CAMPAIGN FOR NATIONAL INDEPENDENCE

Was, is and shall remain in favour of Maltese workers

and against Malta's membership of the European Union

WE SWEAR TO FREE MALTA FROM THE SLAVERY, COLONIALISM AND DICTATORIAL ILLEGAL EUROPEAN UNION RULE

It is not true that we cannot leave the European Union

See this European Parliament video that we can leave

European Union membership created for us,

* together with many other problems,

* that of a lack of security

* and a threat to the protection of our people,

* because of the thousands of foreigners

* roaming in our country,

* after together with EU membership,

* we repealed the law that did not allow foreigners to remain in Malta

* if they are not given permission, or as tourists for a limited time.

According to an answer to a Parliamentary Question lately, it resulted that there are more than 7,500 foreigners working in our country with permission.

It is not known how many thousands are working without permission.

Among the thousands of foreigners that have invaded our country,

* a number of them are creating a problem

* for the protection of our people,

* because they are taking part in illegal activities

* as partners with Maltese criminal persons.

The Police Corps, notwithstanding their good will, is little equipped to keep up with the local organized criminality and certainly is in no position to fight against foreign organized criminal elements that come to our country and go back, without any control or surveillance, frequently without even knowing about them.

The lack of control and surveillance on foreigners in our country is making it easier for the Sicilian Mafia and the Russian Mafia to work among us with Maltese partners.

Persons who have experience of organized criminality insist that a number of robberies by means of armed hold-ups and murders, that happened these last years in Malta, foreign criminals were fully involved.

These cases are increasing in number and increasing in the professional manner with which they are being carried out and with the arms that are being used in them.

The impression in the public mind, good or bad, is that the Maltese Police Corps is losing the fight against organized criminality, and that the criminal elements are being more barefaced and arrogant in the attempts they are doing and that they are not holding back from shooting and killing.

It will be in the interest of the protection of our people if we re-introduce the need for control of passports for whoever enters and leaves our country, and a record is kept of them.

European Union membership removed from us this control and thus weakened the protection of our people.

With the increase of organized criminality, European Union membership appears to have created another problem for the Police Corps.

This is the explosion of cases of corruption in the public sector that the Government is throwing at the Police Commissioners lap to investigate as if in the Police Corps there is some group of experts that are only employed on cases of corruption in the public sector.

It is a fact that no one can boast about that in the Maltese public minds corruption has spread at every level in the public sector, and has grown strong roots these last years, and not as they used to tell us prior to becoming European union members, was destroyed roots and all.

The Maltese public is not convinced that there was not great corruption in the case of the Mater Dei Hospital (which means the “Mother of God”, but it is more fitting to be remembered as “Mater Dejn”, or the “Mother of Debt”, due to the scandalous manner that its cost increased three times what it was projected).

The public is not given full information about the big case of corruption in the Department of VAT Tax, where millions of euros were stolen from public funds.

The public does not have their minds at rest that there is not a lot of corruption in the Planning and Environment Authority, and that there is no corruption in the Public Transport Authority, as well as the Maritime Authority.

The public is right to expect that a serious investigation be made about the contract of the Fairmount ships that bankrupted the Shipyard with the millions of euros that was lost on them.

The public also expects that a serious investigation be held

* about the contract for the new power station,

* and especially about who was responsible

* that midway through the process of the call for tenders,

* the regulations were changed so that instead of as had been planned,

* that the power station works with gas,

* it will work with heavy fuel oil,

* and thus it was possible that the contract be given to the company to which it was given.

These cases, and a number of similar ones, happened without the European Union saying anything.

We cannot expect protection from the European Union on corruption, when the same European Union is full of corruption itself.

Neither should we pretend that the Police Commissioner investigates such cases, where there may be political persons responsible.

Allegations of corruption should be investigated by the commission that was purposely set up against corruption, presided by an ex- Judge and that was given the power to administer the oath and force a person to give evidence, and if it does not, criminal procedures may be taken against the person.

Why does the Prime Minister abuse the Police Commissioner whenever a case of corruption is mentioned, instead of telling the Commission Against Corruption to investigate the case itself?

Is it not in the peoples’ interest that the Police efforts would all be addressed to ensure the security and protection from organized criminality, while the Commission Against Corruption would be guarding all the time about all that is happening in the public sector, mostly where contracts are concerned and particularly to examine the great number of direct orders that are give and which involve millions of euros from public funds, as well as a great number of consultations that are requested and for which are paid hundreds of thousands of euros from public funds?

It will be useful for our people if everyone is involved in the administration of the country will know that he is being controlled in whatever he does and will be held responsible for his actions even after leaving his office.

Whoever does not deceive in what he does, should not be troubled by being controlled.

We do not expect the European Union to tell us how to curb corruption, when the Union itself is full of it.

We expect, instead, that with EU membership, cases of corruption increase,

as we have seen happening in the six years that we have been Union.

During the Parliamentary debate on the motion of n o confidence

* that the Labour Opposition presented against the Minister Dolores Cristina

* on the suspension of funds by the European Union

* for Maltese and Gozitan students

* who go to study in some university

* of a European Union member state,

* the Nationalist Deputy Dr Beppe Fenech Adami (photo)

* was quoted as saying that had it been for the Labour Party,

* “we would not have had suspended funds from the European Union, but no funds would have come from the European Union”.

It appears that this Parliamentary Deputy has still not waken up from the stupor with which his father had made the Maltese people drunk when he promised them that with European Union membership, a rain of millions of liri or euros will start falling on our country.

I think, therefore, it would be beneficial for this deputy if I try to waken him from the stupor that he still has.

I will start by telling him that if Malta really remained a sovereign and independent country out of the European Union, we would not have lost about Lm12 million every year (€28 million) from the Italian Protocol.

The Maltese people would not have had to pay millions of euros every year

* in taxes that the European Union imposed upon us,

* such as VAT

* and Eco-Tax,

* taxes on oil products

* and more. 

We would not have paid the European Union €376 million so that perhaps we will free Greece from the financial trouble that it is in.

And neither would we have had to guarantee between another €350 and €400 million in case other member states find themselves in the same trouble as Greece.

Dr Beppe Fenech Adami should not think that this is all.

There is still much more.

We would not have had to pay a whole regiment of civil servants whose work is only concerned with Malta’s European Union membership.

Neither would we have had to buy Malta House in Brussels and spend Lm12 million, for two-thirds of it to remain empty, at an enormous expense for the Maltese people.

I remind this Nationalist Deputy that a foreign organization that specializes in affairs that are connected with the European Union, “Open Europe”, in a study it has conducted, found out that the expense for Malta to implement the European regulations and directives is about €72.5 million every year.

It not in vain that the Government never accepted the challenge to make a cost-benefit analysis of European Union membership, because it knows that the result will be that Malta is losing great millions of euros every year, and not benefitting financially from the European Union.

I hope that Deputy Beppe Fenech Adami now wakes up.

The European Union, where it wants interferes in everything.

Where it does not want to it closes its eyes to all the damage that is going to be made.

In the case of the building of the new power station in Dellimara the EU does not want to interfere when the contract for the new power station was taken by a company from another EU country, although the worst means are going to be used for it to work with, “heavy fuel oil.”

Oil is pumped from underground and also from under the sea, and consists of a whole and various mixture of what are called “hydrocarbons”.

The oil companies use cold and heat to separate this mixture.

First the hydrocarbons that are taken are the light ones then those a little heavier, and they continue like this until they arrive at tar and useless remains, the sludge.

We do not know them as hydrocarbons, but as aviation spirit, petrol, diesel etc.

These products are not required in the same amounts.

As an example petrol is required more than kerosene.

Therefore the oil companies developed processes to break down the kerosene hydrocarbons to take petrol.

The process is called ‘fractioning’, but this is not stable for a long time.

Apart from this, when you go lower down the scale, that is heavy fuel oil’, this leaves smoke when it is burned, makes soot and poisons that contaminate the air.

A little of these remains that is emitted from the chimneys can be collected by a sort of sieves.

But these sieves that collect the emissions emitted from the chimneys, together with the remains that are heavier and that are not emitted through the chimneys, amount to tons every day.

How are we going to get rid of it?

Up to some time ago the European countries used to find a poor African country that allows them to bury this dangerous material n their country and give the some money or arms.

Is this right?

Is this what the Maltese Government is going to do, with the EU blessings?

I am asking because the smallness of our country we do not even have the space to dump our households refuse, more so these remains that are emitted by the chimneys.

Another problem was mentioned about this new power station. It was said that if we do not buy it, we will incur a penalty of 50% more than its cost price.

Such a thing doesn’t make sense.

If you bind yourself to but a €10,000 car and you do not pay it, you may lose the deposit, and perhaps in an extreme case, you will have to pay the whole car price, but it was never heard that you will have to pay a penalty of €15,000 (50% more than the price).

So how is it being said that of we do not take the power station of €200 million we will incur a penalty of €300 million?

This does not make sense.

The Maltese Government is not telling the people everything, when the people are going to pay for everything.

The people have a right to know what this problem of all this hiding is.

I have a question to make.

The Netherlands, from where this power station is coming, has a big oil industry.

It certainly has a great reserve of its remains.

Can it be that this experimental power station machinery that they are going to bring here with the help of the Nationalist Government is designed and made to get rid of this oil?

And I continue to ask:

Is there any chance that later on we find that our new power station shall have to work only with this oil especially modified to be burned in this power station machinery?

This means therefore, that if we do not buy this power station and it remains on their stomach, they will also have to keep this oil that they have in excess.

These questions come naturally, once all these mysteries and hiding from the Maltese people, with the EU saying that it’s not its business.

Therefore I appeal to the Government not to continue with this attitude and admit all the facts to our people, as it is its duty to do.

Thursday 8 July 2010

The Maltese people want Parliament to take steps forthwith to curb immigration in our country

e-mail: cnimalta at yahoo.co.uk 

Thank you for visiting our website

Support our fight for Independence and Freedom

Do you want to help us regain our Independence and Freedom?

If yes, help CNI in its work so that the majority of the people would want to get rid of European Union rule.

Become a CNI member by sending €5 together with this application form to,  

The Financial Secretary CNI,

60A Strait Street

Valletta

Name .......................................................

Address ....................................................

ID Number................................................

Thank you for your help

Free and neutral Malta shall overcome