WELCOME TO THE CNI WEBPAGE

WE SWEAR TO FREE MALTA FROM THE SLAVERY, COLONIALISM AND DICTATORIAL ILLEGAL EUROPEAN UNION RULE

TELL YOUR PARLIAMENTARY DEPUTY THAT YOU WANT MALTA TO REGAIN INDEPENDENCE AND FREEDOM

The European Union ordered that in 2011 the Maltese and Gozitan people pay it €68,000,000

€186,000 daily stolen from your childrens mouths

The EU threatens family values

We have always insisted that the social policy of the European Union is a serious threat to the Maltese family values.

We have always been disgusted how this fundamental most negative aspect of the Union was sidelined for partisan political considerations when the people were asked in 2003 whether they agree with membership of our country in the Union.

They shied away from their duty to tell the people that membership in the Union was going to undermine the family values, as happened in every country that became a member in the Union.

Now the European Bishops (not the Maltese and Gozitan ones), appear to have awakened and came out nail and tooth against the European Union, with a report titled

"Proposal for a strategy of the European Union for the Support of Couples and Marriage".

They accused the Union that with its policy it is totally ignoring the importance of marriage in the employment sector, of social security and the reduction of poverty.

They also condemned it that instead of supporting it is discriminating against parents who do not go out to work in order to take care of their children upbringing.

Because shamelessly the European Union considers mothers who do not go to work, as wasted human resources in the employment sector or not utilized, and therefore it insists with the member countries to increase the participation rate of the children mothers, has less importance than the contribution of the mothers for the economy of the country.

The European Bishops harshly criticized the European Union proposal for the member countries to recognize as a civil union that two persons live together (‘de facto union’), and give legal recognition to partnerships between two persons (‘registered partnership’).

They insist that these Union proposals, that are to lead the member states too recognize by law these unions, accept them, weakens in a perilous manner the importance of marriage.

The Bishops objected that the Union interferes in the right of every sovereign country to regulate marriage itself, according to its national laws, because when the Union tells the country what it has to do in this sector so fundamental to the social life of the people, it will be exceeding its mandate.

It’s not a question of whether the European Union is going to take notice of what the Bishops have said, or whether it is going to continue with its damaging policy for the family.

The issue is whether the European Christians (including the Maltese and Gozitans) are going to take heed to the Bishops warnings on the family, or are going to be servile to the Union, at the cost that this destroys the family.

In our opinion, the Maltese family can only be saved if our country does not continue to embrace the European Union policy.

Next month we shall be five years from when a small majority of those who voted in the referendum said that they agree with the membership agreement of our country in the European Union.

We have never stopped insisting that the vote was neither fair nor democratic, due to the many millions that were spent by the European Union in propaganda in favour of membership, in contrast with the small means that were given to those who did not agree with membership.

It could not result otherwise that the imbalance in the propaganda means influenced the voters and did not leave them in a free position to weigh correctly whether it was better for our country to become a member in the Union.

That is why we have always insisted and will continue to insist that that decision was vitiated, and that even on this only, should be set aside.

But even if the vote in 2003 in favour of membership in the Union was not vitiated, just the same democracy tells you that that decision can be changed in any moment by another popular vote.

Whenever the majority of the Maltese and Gozitans want to, they should have the means to vote to annul the decision in favour of our country’s membership in the European Union.

This democratic right now has the official recognition of the Maltese Parliament that voted in favour of the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty, which in its Article 49 provides for the exit of a member state from the Union.

This is why no one should continue to deceive the people by telling them that membership of our country in the Union is an irreversible and impossible step.

Once it is possible for our country to leave the European Union, we have a patriotic right, we the Campaign for National Independence CNI, to strive for there to be a majority that agrees that our country should not remain a member in the Union and not to continue to be led by it as a colony, but be led again according the will of the majority of the Maltese and Gozitans, as expressed democratically in general elections.

The issue is not whether we have a right to leave the European Union, but whether we should do so in the general interest of the Maltese people.

We the Campaign for National Independence CNI accept the challenge to prove that it will be good for the Maltese people not to remain bound by the Union rules and will not have to forcefully implement the Union policy which is damaging to our country.

* Financially,

Financially it is better for us because we are paying and incurring expenses more than we receive funds as a result of membership in the Union.

Economically it is better for us because we can attract and keep factories in our country if we are not bound by the regulations and burdened by the burdens of the European Union.

Socially it will be better for us because we will not have to forcefully abide by anti-social policy of the Union and we can strengthen, not dismantle, our social services.

Politically it will be better for us to be independent from the Union and we will not be members in a common defence policy that the Union is drafting.

And above all it will be better for us because, free from the Union yoke, the Maltese and Gozitan people can every five years decide with what financial, economic, political and social policy it should be led, according to the will of the majority democratically expressed in our country.

Thus the people shall again be sovereign, independent and free and no longer a colony of the foreigners as happened to us with membership in the European Union.

For that dawn we, the Campaign for National Independence CNI shall continue to strive.

How much they told us we could export our Christian values!

We wish to know what passed through the minds of those few political priests that used to write in the newspapers prior to the Referendum to encourage the Maltese and Gozitan faithful to vote yes, so that we Maltese “would be able to export our faith and Christian values to Europe”, when they read the news these days that the European Court for Human Rights decided that gay couples (homosexuals) should have the right to adopt children.

Since Malta is a signatory of the European Convention on Human Rights, the decision of the European Court must also be applied by Malta.

An important point which emanates from this decision is what happens if this same Court would decide – if it has not already decided – that abortion is also a fundamental human right, or in this case, of the woman.

What use will the derogation that Malta was given by the European Commission, that Malta can continue to keep its legislation that it has that prohibits every type of abortion?

Will Malta be able to tell the European Court of Human Rights that we have a derogation about abortion and therefore we are not bound by some decision that is taken by the European Court of Human Rights, when this Court is independent and has nothing to do with the EU for its decisions?

Who knows whether we shall hear the Ecclesiastical Authorities speak clearly about this decision and its consequences even where abortion is concerned, especially when we know that the European Union itself has long accepted not only the adoption of children by homosexual couples, but also marriages by homosexual couples!

More and more we are eager to see what are those priests and religious persons who used to write in their page in The Sunday Times prior to the Referendum: "Even God wants us to join the EU".

If yes, help CNI in its work so that the majority of the people would want to get rid of European Union rule.